Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Svyatoslav Gulin vs Hazem Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gulin vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
Svyatoslav Gulin vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gulin 1 - 0 Naow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gulin has won 51.07% of points on their second serve, while Naow has won 49.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gulin, in recent form, has won 47.5% of their opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 56.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.85% and 34.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gulin has saved 58.79% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 62.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gulin has won 63.64% of matches played (W/L 49/ 28), with Naow winning 69.14% (W/L 56/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gulin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 103/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3). Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 55/ 38).
- Player level: In the last year, Gulin has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.67% of matches (W/L 44/ 23), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.08% of matches (W/L 38/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gulin winning 1 times and Naow being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gulin winning 2 and Naow winning 0. The last match between Gulin and Naow was at the M15 Kamen, 30-06-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Svyatoslav Gulin getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gulin and Naow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gulin winning 0 times and Naow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gulin winning 0, and Naow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gulin has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.58 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 181.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gulin has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gulin has converted 44.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 43.52% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
434
Rank
414
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
343
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
Form
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
67% (118-58)
Career Total W/L
66% (152-80)
52% (14-13)
YTD W/L
73% (27-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Svyatoslav Gulin | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (30/53) | 63% (27/43) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 63% (17/27) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (14/23) | 25% (4/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 0% (0/4) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (22/43) | 30% (16/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Hazem Naow
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Svyatoslav Gulin | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 52% (14/13) | 73% (27/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (33/29) | 67% (56/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (299/269) | 56% (424/337) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 48% (11/12) | 67% (8/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 76% (19/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.2 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 55 | 77 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 133 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:1 | 1:37:3 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.89 | 250.19 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1135/1885) | 63% (1595/2525) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (737/1135) | 69% (1105/1595) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (383/750) | 49% (456/930) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (90/201) | 43% (126/290) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (762/1810) | 43% (1067/2489) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 71% (15/6) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (14/10) | 80% (12/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (13/26) | 73% (27/37) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (3/9) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (15/12) | 100% (23/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (15/3) | 0% (23/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 29% (14/4) |
Svyatoslav Gulin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Fermin Tenti
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve %
41%
(
9 of
22)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
23
Total Points Won
15
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Mihail Ivanov
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
85%
(
44 of
52)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
48%
(
43 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
89 of
148)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
55 of
89)
60%
(
28 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
60 of
148)
122
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joao Domingues
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Diego Fernandez Flores
68%
(
69 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
74 of
107)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
67%
(
22 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
35 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(2) 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oriol Roca Batalla
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Julio Cesar Porras
Player
Svyatoslav Gulin
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
50
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Philip Hjorth
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Roger Pascual Ferra
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Manel Lazaro Juncadella
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Hazem Naow
95%
(
54 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
85%
(
52 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
33 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Hazem Naow
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
9
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Gulin Vs Naow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Svyatoslav Gulin
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
